Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 10, Number 4, pp. 835-860
© 2001 Oxford University Press
‘Old Economy’ Inputs for ‘New Economy’ Outcomes: Cluster Formation in the New Silicon Valleys
Stanford University, Stanford, CA. tbres{at}stanford.edu
Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy. gambardella{at}sssup.it
University of California, Berkeley. anno{at}socrates.berkeley.edu
Abstract
This paper discusses the results of a two-year research project on the sources of success in regional clusters of entrepreneurship and innovation like Silicon Valley. Our project has studied a number of locations, most of which have shown spectacular rates of growth of information and communcations technology-related activities during the 1990s. Our case studies comprise some emerging regions, notably in Ireland, India, Israel and Taiwan, along with more advanced areas like Northern Virginia in the US, Cambridge, UK, the Scandinavian countries and the Silicon Valley 40 years ago by way of the memory of one of its ‘father founders’, Gordon Moore. Through visits, interviews and other materials, we uncovered some regularities about the determinants of success of these entrepreneurial-led models of economic growth. We find that the economic factors that give rise to the start of a cluster can be very different from those that keep it going. Agglomeration economies, external effects and ‘social increasing returns’ of any sort arise almost naturally after a cluster has taken off. But the most difficult and risky part is to get the new clusters started. At that stage, ‘old economy’ factors like firm-building capabilities, managerial skills, a substantial supply of skilled labor and connection to markets were crucial for the take off of these ‘new economy’ clusters (including Silicon Valley 40 years ago).
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. T. McCann and T. B. Folta Location Matters: Where We Have Been and Where We Might Go in Agglomeration Research Journal of Management, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 532 - 565. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Bottazzi, G. Dosi, G. Fagiolo, and A. Secchi Modeling industrial evolution in geographical space J. Econ. Geogr., September 1, 2007; 7(5): 651 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Whitford and C. Potter Regional economies, open networks and the spatial fragmentation of production Socioecon. Rev., July 1, 2007; 5(3): 497 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Grabher and O. Ibert Bad company? The ambiguity of personal knowledge networks J. Econ. Geogr., June 1, 2006; 6(3): 251 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Boschma and K. Frenken Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography J. Econ. Geogr., June 1, 2006; 6(3): 273 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Bathelt Geographies of production: growth regimes in spatial perspective (II) - knowledge creation and growth in clusters Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2005; 29(2): 204 - 216. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. C. White Inward Investment, Firm Embeddedness and Place: An Assessment of Ireland's Multinational Software Sector European Urban and Regional Studies, July 1, 2004; 11(3): 243 - 260. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Wolfe and M. S. Gertler Clusters from the Inside and Out: Local Dynamics and Global Linkages Urban Stud, May 1, 2004; 41(5-6): 1071 - 1093. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Bathelt, A. Malmberg, and P. Maskell Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation Progress in Human Geography, February 1, 2004; 28(1): 31 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|