Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 11, Number 3, pp. 451-496
© 2002 Oxford University Press
Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization
Timothy J. Sturgeon, Industrial Performance Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1 Amherst Street E40-369, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Email: sturgeon{at}mit.edu.
Abstract
This paper uses the case of contract manufacturing in the electronics industry to illustrate an emergent American model of industrial organization, the modular production network. Lead firms in the modular production network concentrate on the creation, penetration and defense of markets for end products—and increasingly the provision of services to go with them—while manufacturing capacity is shifted out-of-house to globally operating turn-key suppliers. The modular production network relies on codified inter-firm links and the generic manufacturing capacity residing in turn-key suppliers to reduce transaction costs, build large external economies of scale and reduce risk for network actors. I test the modular production network model against some of the key theoretical tools that have been developed to predict and explain industry structure: Joseph Schumpeter's notion of innovation in the giant firm; Alfred Chandler's ideas about economies of speed and the rise of the modern corporation; Oliver Williamson's transaction cost framework; and a range of other production network models that appear in the literature. I argue that the modular production network yields better economic performance in the context of globalization than more spatially and socially embedded network models. I view the emergence of the modular production network as part of a historical process of industrial transformation in which nationally specific models of industrial organization co-evolve in intensifying rounds of competition, diffusion and adaptation.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Pietrobelli and F. Saliola Power relationships along the value chain: multinational firms, global buyers and performance of local suppliers Camb. J. Econ., June 3, 2008; (2008) ben016v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Sturgeon, J. Van Biesebroeck, and G. Gereffi Value chains, networks and clusters: reframing the global automotive industry J. Econ. Geogr., May 1, 2008; 8(3): 297 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Lane National capitalisms and global production networks: an analysis of their interaction in two global industries Socioecon. Rev., April 1, 2008; 6(2): 227 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-K. Lee and A. Saxenian Coevolution and coordination: a systemic analysis of the Taiwanese information technology industry J. Econ. Geogr., March 1, 2008; 8(2): 157 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Y. Baldwin Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms Ind. Corp. Change, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 155 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Whitford and C. Potter Regional economies, open networks and the spatial fragmentation of production Socioecon. Rev., July 1, 2007; 5(3): 497 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Flowers Organizational capabilities and technology acquisition: why firms know less than they buy Ind. Corp. Change, June 1, 2007; 16(3): 317 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. L. McNamara New Places But Old Spaces: Knowledge Hierarchies Among Asian Small and Medium Size Enterprises Abroad Organization, July 1, 2006; 13(4): 549 - 567. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Brusoni The Limits to Specialization: Problem Solving and Coordination in 'Modular Networks' Organization Studies, December 1, 2005; 26(12): 1885 - 1907. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Hobday, A. Davies, and A. Prencipe Systems integration: a core capability of the modern corporation Ind. Corp. Change, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 1109 - 1143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|