Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feldman, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D23 - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 12, Number 4, pp. 727-752
© 2003 Oxford University Press

A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines

Martha S. Feldman

University of Michigan, Michigan, USA. Email: msfeldman{at}umich.edu.

Abstract

This paper is about stability in organizational routines. It proposes a new explanation of stability, based on mindfulness rather than mindlessness. Traditional explanations of stability (or lack of change) in organizational routines suggest that organizational participants are not thinking about what they are doing, but repeating actions that they have taken in the past. In this paper I suggest that stability can also occur because organizational participants are making conscious efforts to understand what actions make sense in the context in which the work is being performed. The argument is that organizational participants use what they understand about how the organization operates to guide their performances within the routine. Relevant performances, such as the performances of supervisors, are integral to what people understand about how the organization operates. Organizational members use these understandings in choosing whether to enact the requested change. In so doing, they create and recreate the understandings about how the organization operates. This explanation is similar to performative explanations of change in organizational routines, though these explanations have focused on the effect of doing the routine on the production and reproduction of the routine rather than the production and reproduction of understandings about how the organization operates.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
H. C. Bruns
Leveraging functionality in safety routines: Examining the divergence of rules and performance
Human Relations, September 1, 2009; 62(9): 1399 - 1426.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Cambridge J EconHome page
J. Runde, M. Jones, K. Munir, and L. Nikolychuk
On technological objects and the adoption of technological product innovations: rules, routines and the transition from analogue photography to digital imaging
Camb. J. Econ., January 1, 2009; 33(1): 1 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
T. Greenhalgh
Role of routines in collaborative work in healthcare organisations
BMJ, November 17, 2008; 337(nov17_1): a2448 - a2448.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
A. Essen
Variability as a source of stability: Studying routines in the elderly home care setting
Human Relations, November 1, 2008; 61(11): 1617 - 1644.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
M. Lounsbury and E. T. Crumley
New Practice Creation: An Institutional Perspective on Innovation
Organization Studies, July 1, 2007; 28(7): 993 - 1012.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.