Skip Navigation


ICC Advance Access originally published online on January 26, 2006
Industrial and Corporate Change 2006 15(1):101-122; doi:10.1093/icc/dtj004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/1/101    most recent
dtj004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amable, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gatti, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved.

Labor and product market reforms: questioning policy complementarity

Bruno Amable

Donatella Gatti

Correspondence: Bruno Amable, University of Paris X-Nanterre, PsE & CEPREMAP, 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France. e-mail: bruno.amable{at}ens.fr

Correspondence: Donatella Gatti, University of Lyon 2, PSE, IZA & CEPREMAP, 142 rue de Chevaleret, 75013 Paris, France. e-mail: donatella.gatti{at}cepremap.cnrs.fr

This article proposes a dynamic efficiency wages model with imperfect competition on labor and product markets. In this framework, job insecurity generates a perverse effect on workers incentives, which shifts up the real wages schedule and may yield employment losses. Product market regulation and redundancy payments contribute to reducing labor turnover, thus easing the workers incentive constraint. Consequently, and against conventional wisdom, regulations may have a positive impact on employment, and a substitution effect may emerge across deregulation policies. Moreover, in some cases, a complementarity arises between regulations in product and labor markets, both interacting to ensure more stable labor relations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OXF ECON PAPHome page
P. Commendatore and I. Kubin
Dynamic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labour markets
Oxf. Econ. Pap., June 19, 2008; (2008) gpn019v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.