ICC Advance Access originally published online on March 22, 2006
Industrial and Corporate Change 2006 15(2):353-371; doi:10.1093/icc/dtl003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schumpeter, Winter, and the sources of novelty
Correspondence: Markus C. Becker, CNRS, BETA, Strasbourg University, 61 Avenue de la Foret Noire, F-67085 Strasbourg, France. e-mail: becker{at}cournot.u-strasbg.fr
Correspondence: Thorbjørn Knudsen, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark. e-mail: tok{at}sam.sdu.dk
Correspondence: James G. March, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-3096, USA. e-mail: march{at}stanford.edu
This article examines what Joseph Schumpeter said on the emergence of novelty in economic institutions, what Sidney Winter did to build on and deviate from that foundation, and what puzzles remain. Winter built a framework for answers to a puzzle that Schumpeter could not solvehow novelty emerges in a system based on routines. He identified two major sources of novelty: the combinatorics of routines and the unreliability of routine imitation. As possible inspirations for further progress in evolutionary thought, the article points to ideas from chemistry, linguistics, and the diffusion of fashion for elaborations of these key Winterian insights.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-A. Lamberg and H. Tikkanen Changing sources of competitive advantage: cognition and path dependence in the Finnish retail industry 1945-1995 Ind. Corp. Change, October 1, 2006; 15(5): 811 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
