Skip Navigation


ICC Advance Access originally published online on March 22, 2006
Industrial and Corporate Change 2006 15(2):353-371; doi:10.1093/icc/dtl003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/2/353    most recent
dtl003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Becker, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by March, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow B52 - Institutional; Evolutionary
Right arrow D21 - Firm Behavior
Right arrow L21 - Business Objectives of the Firm
Right arrow O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved.

Schumpeter, Winter, and the sources of novelty

Markus C. Becker, Thorbjørn Knudsen and James G. March

Correspondence: Markus C. Becker, CNRS, BETA, Strasbourg University, 61 Avenue de la Foret Noire, F-67085 Strasbourg, France. e-mail: becker{at}cournot.u-strasbg.fr

Correspondence: Thorbjørn Knudsen, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark. e-mail: tok{at}sam.sdu.dk

Correspondence: James G. March, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-3096, USA. e-mail: march{at}stanford.edu

This article examines what Joseph Schumpeter said on the emergence of novelty in economic institutions, what Sidney Winter did to build on and deviate from that foundation, and what puzzles remain. Winter built a framework for answers to a puzzle that Schumpeter could not solve—how novelty emerges in a system based on routines. He identified two major sources of novelty: the combinatorics of routines and the unreliability of routine imitation. As possible inspirations for further progress in evolutionary thought, the article points to ideas from chemistry, linguistics, and the diffusion of fashion for elaborations of these key Winterian insights.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ind Corp ChangeHome page
J.-A. Lamberg and H. Tikkanen
Changing sources of competitive advantage: cognition and path dependence in the Finnish retail industry 1945-1995
Ind. Corp. Change, October 1, 2006; 15(5): 811 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.