ICC Advance Access originally published online on March 22, 2006
Industrial and Corporate Change 2006 15(2):395-416; doi:10.1093/icc/dtl005
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Understanding complex organization: the role of know-how, internal structure, and human behavior in the evolution of capabilities1
Correspondence: Mie Augier, Stanford University, 70 Cubberley, Stanford, CA 94305-3096, USA. e-mail: augier{at}stanford.edu
Correspondence: David J. Teece, Institute of Management, Innovation and Organization, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. e-mail: teece{at}haas.berkeley.edu
This article begins with some notes on the intellectual climate in which the article of (Winter 1968, "Towards a Neo-Schumpeterian Theory of the Firm," The RAND Corporation; 2006, Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 1) was first written. It identifies core ideas and contentions Sidney Winter helped put on the research agenda for scholars interested in complex business organization. We point out that Winters early contentions have implications for strategic thinking (in both business and military contexts) and that a promising research agenda lies in the further development of notions of organizational capability.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-A. Lamberg and H. Tikkanen Changing sources of competitive advantage: cognition and path dependence in the Finnish retail industry 1945-1995 Ind. Corp. Change, October 1, 2006; 15(5): 811 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
