Skip Navigation


ICC Advance Access originally published online on May 4, 2006
Industrial and Corporate Change 2006 15(3):497-529; doi:10.1093/icc/dtl008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/3/497    most recent
dtl008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fink, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by James, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D23 - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
Right arrow L14 - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation; Networks
Right arrow L73 - Forest Products
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved.

Transaction cost economics, resource dependence theory, and customer–supplier relationships

Robert C. Fink

Linda F. Edelman

Kenneth J. Hatten

William L. James

Correspondence: Robert C. Fink, Department of Business Administration, Worcester State College, 486 Chandler Street, Worcester, MA 01886, USA. e-mail: rfink{at}worcester.edu

Correspondence: Linda F. Edelman, Management Department, Bentley College, 175 Forest Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA. e-mail: ledelman{at}bentley.edu

Correspondence: Kenneth J. Hatten, School of Management, Boston University, 595 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA. e-mail: kjhatten{at}bu.edu

Correspondence: William L. James, Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA. e-mail: mktwlj{at}hofstra.edu

This study develops and then tests an expanded conceptual framework for understanding relational customer–supplier exchanges. The explanatory power of transaction cost economics and resource dependence theory is examined, first individually, and then the theories are unified to provide a more comprehensive model for understanding of firms’ decisions to pursue relational exchanges. Regression analyses performed on data from 372 pulp, paper, and paperboard mills indicate that the combined framework provides a better explanation of customer choices than either theory individually. Implications and future research are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.