Skip Navigation


ICC Advance Access originally published online on May 26, 2007
Industrial and Corporate Change 2007 16(3):427-454; doi:10.1093/icc/dtm008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/3/427    most recent
dtm008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castañeda, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow G21 - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
Right arrow G32 - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure
Right arrow O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
Right arrow O16 - Economic Development: Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
Right arrow O47 - Measurement of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved.

Business groups and internal capital markets: the recovery of the Mexican economy in the aftermath of the 1995 crisis

Gonzalo Castañeda

Correspondence: Gonzalo Castañeda, El Colegio de México, Camino al Ajusco 20, Pedregal de Santa Teresa, D.F. 10740, México. e-mail: sociomatica{at}hotmail.com

In the second half of the nineties, the Mexican economy experienced a severe financial crisis. However, as the initial panic subsided, Mexico started to show promising signals of macroeconomic recovery. Not only did the economy rebound within a year but also grew steadily afterward, averaging an annual rate slightly above 5% during 1996–2000. In this article, it is suggested that the business group structure helped in the recovery of the economy. The collapse of the banking system, and the interruption of financing flows through the domestic financial markets, was overcome by a change in the firms’ capital structure. Firms, when possible, started to depend more on trade credit, and the internal capital market of business groups created a financial cushion that kept the economy working. In order to offer a rationale for the Mexican experience, a theoretical model is presented where it is shown that moral hazard problems are reduced within a business group as long as affiliated firms in the nontradable sector surrender control rights during periods of crisis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.