Skip Navigation


ICC Advance Access originally published online on November 21, 2007
Industrial and Corporate Change 2007 16(6):983-1035; doi:10.1093/icc/dtm030
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/6/983    most recent
dtm030v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lazonick, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information
Right arrow G10 - General
Right arrow G32 - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure
Right arrow G34 - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
Right arrow O30 - General
Right arrow O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved.

The US stock market and the governance of innovative enterprise*

William Lazonick

Correspondence: William Lazonick, Department of Regional Economic and Social Development, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA. e-mail: william_lazonick{at}uml.edu

During the 1980s and 1990s, the argument that "maximizing shareholder value" results in superior economic performance came to dominate the corporate governance debates. This shareholder-value perspective represents an attempt to construct a theory of corporate governance that is consistent with the neoclassical theory of the market economy. I outline the rationale for the shareholder-value perspective, and show that, rooted in agency theory, it lacks a theory of innovative enterprise. To go beyond agency theory and its shareholder-value perspective, I present a framework for analyzing the functions of the stock market in the business corporation and the influence of these functions on the innovation process. I then apply this framework to the experience of the US ICT industries over the past decade to consider empirically the influences of the five functions of the stock market—summarized as "creation," "control," "combination," "compensation," and "cash"—on innovative enterprise in US high-technology industries. In the conclusion, I draw out the implications of the changing functions of the stock market for the governance of innovative enterprise.


*The research contained in this article has been supported by The Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER); ESEMK project funded by the European Commission under the 6th Framework Programme (contract CIT2-CT-2004-506077); and The Work Foundation (London). Previous versions of this article were presented at the Conference on Institutions for Economic Development, WIDER, Helsinki, April 18–19, 2005; Conference on Perspectives of Corporate Governance, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), March 9–10, 2006; and Conference on Capital Matters: Managing Labor's Capital, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, April 26–28, 2006. Many of the ideas presented here reflect my collaboration with Mary O'Sullivan, for whose insights I am grateful. Yue Zhang, Dimitra Paparounas, Mustafa Erdem Sakinc, and Gao He provided excellent research assistance. A previous and shorter version of this article appeared as "Shareholder Value and Governance of Innovative Enterprise" in Ulrich Jürgens, Gunnar Folke Schuppert, Dieter, Sadowski, and Manfred Weiss, eds., Perspectives of Corporate Governance (Perspektiven der Corporate Governance), Nomos, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ind Corp ChangeHome page
P. Nightingale
Meta-paradigm change and the theory of the firm
Ind. Corp. Change, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 533 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.