Meta-paradigm change and the theory of the firm
Correspondence: Dr Paul Nightingale, SPRU, Freeman Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QE, UK. e-mail: p.nightingale{at}sussex.ac.uk
Many seemingly unrelated debates on the theory of the firm are in fact part of a single, deeper transformation of the social sciences. As the foundational assumptions of 20th century social science have slowly been shown by science to be false, new sub-paradigms have emerged, which cumulatively drop (i) theoretical assumptions about markets to explain firms; (ii) epistemological assumptions about knowledge to explain diversity; and (iii) metaphysical assumptions about causality to explain technical change. Debates occur across each of these levels.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. von Tunzelmann, F. Malerba, P. Nightingale, and S. Metcalfe Technological paradigms: past, present and future Ind. Corp. Change, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 467 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
