Skip Navigation


ICC Advance Access originally published online on January 12, 2009
Industrial and Corporate Change 2009 18(1):1-50; doi:10.1093/icc/dtn049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/1/1    most recent
dtn049v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mowery, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved.

Plus ca change: Industrial R&D in the "third industrial revolution"

David C. Mowery

Correspondence: David C. Mowery, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1900. e-mail: mowery{at}haas.berkeley.edu

The structure of industrial R&D has undergone considerable change since 1985, particularly in the United States. But rather than creating an entirely novel system, this restructuring has revived important elements of the industrial research "system" of the United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In particular, many of the elements of the "Open Innovation" approach to R&D management are visible in this earlier period. This article surveys the development of industrial R&D in the United States during the postwar period. In addition to emphasizing continuity rather than discontinuity, this discussion of the development of US industrial R&D during the "Third Industrial Revolution" stresses the extent to which industrial R&D in the United States, no less than in other nations, is embedded in a broader institutional context. My discussion also highlights the extent to which its development has been characterized by considerable path dependency.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ENTERPRISE SOCHome page
A. L. Russell
"Industrial Legislatures": Consensus Standardization in the Second and Third Industrial Revolutions
Enterprise Soc., December 1, 2009; 10(4): 661 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Socioecon RevHome page
F. Block and M. R. Keller
Where do innovations come from? Transformations in the US economy, 1970-2006
Socioecon. Rev., July 1, 2009; 7(3): 459 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.