Skip Navigation


ICC Advance Access originally published online on February 12, 2009
Industrial and Corporate Change 2009 18(2):269-294; doi:10.1093/icc/dtp005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/2/269    most recent
dtp005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niosi, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tschang, F. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved.

This article appears in the following Industrial and Corporate Change issue: Special Issue: The Internationalization of Chinese and Indian Firms-Trends, Motivations and Strategy [View the issue table of contents]

The strategies of Chinese and Indian software multinationals: implications for internationalization theory

Jorge Niosi and F. Ted Tschang

Correspondence: Jorgi Niosi, Department of Management and Technology, School of Management Science, University of Québec at Montréal. e-mail: niosi.jorge{at}uqam.ca

Correspondence: F. Ted Tschang, Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University. e-mail: tedt{at}smu.edu.sg

China and India are emerging as major entrants into the international software industry. Both are rapidly learning through outsourcing with multinational enterprises (MNEs) from advanced nations, yet their paths to this dynamic sector are very different. Chinese software firms have focused on their domestic market by working with foreign MNEs, while they move cautiously abroad. Indian firms, which are already large, continue to expand overseas as well as to climb the value chain. Different approaches to MNEs provide useful perspectives. At the same time, the innovation systems approach is necessary to explain the foundations of the industry. The article provides hypotheses and tests them. It concludes that learning internationalization processes are different in Chinese and Indian MNEs, and provides explanations for the different patterns.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.