Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRANOVETTER, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press

research-article

Coase Revisited: Business Groups in the Modern Economy

MARK GRANOVETTER

(Department of Sociology, Northwestern University Evanston, IL 60208–1330, USA)

Abstract

Ronald Coase's celebrated query as to why economic actors typically aggregate into entities called ‘firms’ rather than transacting as individuals in a market has engendered a vigorous stream of research. This paper asks a parallel question: why is it that in all modern economies, firms themselves aggregate into larger entities, often more stable than any literature predicts, which are here referred to as ‘business groups’? After establishing some working definitions, and discussing the curious conjunction of empirical importance and analytical invisibility of business groups, an attempt is made to establish the most significant dimensions along which such groups vary. We end with some speculations on the role of these groups in economic development.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
U. Muehlberger
Hierarchical Forms of Outsourcing and the Creation of Dependency
Organization Studies, May 1, 2007; 28(5): 709 - 727.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
M. Smangs
The Nature of the Business Group: A Social Network Perspective
Organization, November 1, 2006; 13(6): 889 - 909.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
G. Grabher
Trading routes, bypasses, and risky intersections: mapping the travels of `networks' between economic sociology and economic geography
Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2006; 30(2): 163 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 International SociologyHome page
C.-N. Chung
Institutional Transition and Cultural Inheritance: Network Ownership and Corporate Control of Business Groups in Taiwan, 1970s-1990s
International Sociology, March 1, 2004; 19(1): 25 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 International SociologyHome page
G. G. Hamilton, R. Feenstra, W. Choe, C. K. Kim, and E. M. Lim
Neither States Nor Markets: The Role of Economic Organization in Asian Development
International Sociology, June 1, 2000; 15(2): 288 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
W. P. Barnett, G. A. Mischke, and W. Ocasio
The Evolution of Collective Strategies among Organizations
Organization Studies, March 1, 2000; 21(2): 325 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
E. Clark and A. Soulsby
Organization-Community Embeddedness: The Social Impact of Enterprise Restructuring in the Post-Communist Czech Republic
Human Relations, January 1, 1998; 51(1): 25 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Acta SociologicaHome page
R. Swedberg
New Economic Sociology: What Has Been Accomplished, What Is Ahead?
Acta Sociologica, January 1, 1997; 40(2): 161 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.