Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 8, Number 3, pp. 447-485
© 1999 Oxford University Press
The organizational impact of technological change: a comparative theory of national institutional factors
Harvard Business School, T61 Morgan Hall, Soldiers Field Road, Boston, MA 02163, USA
Abstract
This paper offers a parsimonious theory of national institutional factors that promote or inhibit the formation of start-up firms in the USA and Japan. Three factors are proposed: the technical labor market, the venture capital market and the structure of buyer-supplier ties. Complementarities between these factors cause them to work as a system, while their differences elevate or reduce the level of incentive constraints and appropriability constraints acting on incumbent and start-up firms respectively. As a result, incumbents might be displaced in an industry in one country while incumbent firms in the same industry in another country might persevere, due to the presence or absence of start-up firms. This suggests that there may be no single best way to organize for innovation in different institutional settings; rather, firms must seek to exploit the virtues of their environment, even as they act to mitigate the hazards it poses.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Latzer Information and communication technology innovations: radical and disruptive? New Media Society, June 1, 2009; 11(4): 599 - 619. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Lynskey Determinants of Innovative Activity in Japanese Technology-based Start-up Firms International Small Business Journal, April 1, 2004; 22(2): 159 - 196. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Whitley The Institutional Structuring of Organizational Capabilities: The Role of Authority Sharing and Organizational Careers Organization Studies, June 1, 2003; 24(5): 667 - 695. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Oinas and E. J. Malecki The Evolution of Technologies in Time and Space: From National and Regional to Spatial Innovation Systems International Regional Science Review, January 1, 2002; 25(1): 102 - 131. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||



