Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanca, L
Right arrow Articles by Gallegati, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow G31 - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies
Right arrow L60 - General
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 8, Number 3, pp. 551-572
© 1999 Oxford University Press

The dynamic relation between financial positions and investment: evidence from company account data

L Stancaa and M Gallegatib

a Economics Department, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK
E-mail: stanca@lse.ac.uk
b Dipartimento di Metodi Quantitativi per l'Economia e il Territorio, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy
E-mail: gallegati@deanovell.unian.it

Abstract

A key feature of recent financial business cycle theories is the existence of a two-way dynamic relation between financial factors and investment: over time firms' financial positions are affected by, and in turn affect, investment decisions. This paper investigates the dynamic interaction between financial conditions and investment by estimating and testing vector autoregressions on company account panel data for US manufacturing firms, while considering explicitly sectional and time heterogeneity. The results show that indicators of liquidity and solvency contain significant predictive information for investment at the firm level. We also find evidence of both cross-sectional and time heterogeneity: the role played by financial factors is significantly more important for highly leveraged than for low-debt firms; capital market frictions are shown to have asymmetric effects over the business cycle, displaying a larger impact in contractions than in expansions. Overall, the evidence supports the hypothesis that capital market imperfections have an important role in explaining aggregate cyclical dynamics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ind Corp ChangeHome page
J. O'Brien and P. David
Firm growth and type of debt: the paradox of discretion
Ind. Corp. Change, June 17, 2009; (2009) dtp033v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.