Skip Navigation



ICC Advance Access published online on June 3, 2009

Industrial and Corporate Change, doi:10.1093/icc/dtp015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perkmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved.

The two faces of collaboration: impacts of university-industry relations on public research

Markus Perkmann and Kathryn Walsh

Correspondence: Markus Perkmann, Imperial College Business School, Tanaka Building, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK. e-mail: m.perkmann{at}imperial.ac.uk

Correspondence: Kathryn Walsh, Wolfson School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK. e-mail: k.walsh{at}lboro.ac.uk

We analyze the impact of university–industry relationships on public research. Our inductive study of university–industry collaboration in engineering suggests that basic projects are more likely to yield academically valuable knowledge than applied projects. However, applied projects show higher degrees of partner interdependence and therefore enable exploratory learning by academics, leading to new ideas and projects. This result holds especially for research-oriented academics working in the "sciences of the artificial" and engaging in multiple relationships with industry. Our learning-centred interpretation qualifies the notion of entrepreneurial science as a driver of applied university–industry collaboration. We conclude with implications for science and technology policy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.