ICC Advance Access originally published online on July 1, 2009
Industrial and Corporate Change 2009 18(4):551-574; doi:10.1093/icc/dtp019
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The practice of routines and representations in design and development
Correspondence: Joe Tidd, SPRU (Science and Technology Policy Research), University of Sussex, UK. e-mail: j.tidd{at}sussex.ac.uk
Using observational data from a longitudinal real-time field study, we contribute theoretically, empirically, and methodologically to the role of routines in new product design and development. We focus on the work being done by formal representations and formal routines in the design and development of a complex capital good. We find that, contrary to the emphasis in much of the literature, formal routines and representations, in particular those embodied in artifacts, while pervasive, play only a limited role. Rather, of greater influence are the various non-formal representations used to support interaction and communication: representations from routines (and elsewhere), instead of formal representation of routines. We propose a rebalancing of the relationships between routines and representations, a dialectical and mediating—in contrast to a linear and genetic—relationship.