ICC Advance Access originally published online on June 23, 2009
Industrial and Corporate Change 2009 18(4):671-699; doi:10.1093/icc/dtp021
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Do scientists get fundamental research ideas by solving practical problems?
Correspondence: DISPEA – Politecnico di Torino and BRICK – Collegio Carlo Alberto, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24/b, 10129 Torino, Italy. e-mail: chiara.franzoni{at}polito.it
We discuss the problem-solving nature of scientific activity and maintain that contributions made in the form of improved methodologies, new technologies, and instruments for research are, and will increasingly become, central in experimental sciences and in fields traditionally the realm of pure intellectual speculation. The contribution of scientists to the development of new technologies and techniques for research purposes largely exceeds their contribution to developing technologies for industrial purposes, although the former easily blurs into the latter. We verify the effect of both types of contributions on the productivity of a sample of American star physicists, and show that improving research technologies always boosts the productivity of scientists, whereas developing industrial technologies is beneficial only when the technology stems from a research instrument.