Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnett, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Sorenson, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D23 - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
Right arrow D83 - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief
Right arrow G21 - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 11, Number 2, pp. 289-325
© 2002 Oxford University Press

The Red Queen in organizational creation and development

William P. Barnett and Olav Sorenson

William P. Barnett: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; barnett_william{at}gsb.stanford.edu
Olav Sorenson: Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, 110 Westwood Plaza, Box 951481, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; olav.sorenson{at}anderson.ucla.edu

Abstract

We synthesize organization learning theory and organizational ecology to predict systematic patterns in the founding and growth of organizations over time. Our central argument is that competition triggers organizational learning, which in turn intensifies competition that again triggers an adaptive response. We model this self-exciting dynamic—sometimes referred to as the ‘Red Queen’ in general evolutionary theory—to explain organizational founding and growth rates among the thousands of retail banks that have operated in Illinois at any time from 1900–1993. We find strong evidence that Red Queen evolution led some organizations to grow quickly and to place strong competitive pressure on rivals. Red Queen evolution also helped establish barriers to entry. However, this same evolutionary process appears to make organizations more susceptible to ‘competency traps’, ultimately slowing their growth rates and inviting new market entry. Organizations confronted by a widely varying distribution of competitors grow more slowly and are more likely to face new entrants. Overall, the results suggest that processes of organizational creation and growth emerge from ecologies of learning organizations. More generally, we discuss the use of ecological theory and models to study the empirical consequences of organizational learning.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
M. S. Giarratana and A. Fosfuri
Product Strategies and Survival in Schumpeterian Environments: Evidence from the US Security Software Industry
Organization Studies, June 1, 2007; 28(6): 909 - 929.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
R. Martin and P. Sunley
Path dependence and regional economic evolution
J. Econ. Geogr., August 1, 2006; 6(4): 395 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.