Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 11, Number 5, pp. 995-1009
© 2002 Oxford University Press
A firm as a dialectical being: towards a dynamic theory of a firm
Correspondence: Ryoko Toyama, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate School of Knowledge Science, Tatsunokuhi, Ishikawa 932-1292, Japan. Email: rtoyama{at}jaist.ac.jp.
Abstract
Today, firms are facing many contradictions: efficiency versus creativity; exploitation versus exploration; speed versus time-consuming resource building. This paper argues that a firm's capability to synthesize such contradictions is the key to understanding why a firm can be more efficient at producing knowledge than market. A firm can create new knowledge and capability that go beyond the balancing point in the existing frontier with its synthesizing capability, which is embedded in its knowledge vision, its ba, its creative routines, its incentive systems and its distributed leadership.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Currie, A. Lockett, and O. Suhomlinova The institutionalization of distributed leadership: A 'Catch-22' in English public services Human Relations, November 1, 2009; 62(11): 1735 - 1761. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nair and D. Ahlstrom Balancing Hamiltonian and Jeffersonian Contradictions Within Organizations Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 2008; 17(4): 306 - 317. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Nonaka and R. Toyama Strategic management as distributed practical wisdom (phronesis) Ind. Corp. Change, June 11, 2007; (2007) dtm014v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Tywoniak Knowledge in Four Deformation Dimensions Organization, January 1, 2007; 14(1): 53 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Nonaka, G. von Krogh, and S. Voelpel Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory: Evolutionary Paths and Future Advances Organization Studies, August 1, 2006; 27(8): 1179 - 1208. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yazawa Social Networks in East Asia Theory Culture Society, May 1, 2006; 23(2-3): 314 - 317. [PDF] |
||||





