Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahdi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow L65 - Chemicals; Rubber; Drugs; Biotechnology
Right arrow N50 - General, International, or Comparative
Right arrow O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
Right arrow O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
Right arrow Q16 - R&D; Agricultural Technology; Agricultural Extension Services
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 12, Number 2, pp. 235-270
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Search strategy in product innovation process: theory and evidence from the evolution of agrochemical lead discovery process

Surya Mahdi

SPRU-Science and Technology Policy Research, Mantell Building, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RF, UK. Email: s.mahdi{at}sussex.ac.uk.

Abstract

This paper investigates different problem-solving strategies—herein called ‘search strategies’—in the process of product innovation. It takes issue with the basic assumption of current models of the product innovation process (PIP), which unrealistically consider that the actors of product innovation—the product innovators—are all hyper-rational, homogeneous and non-choice-restricted actors. In order to take into account the more realistic view of the product innovators—as bounded rational, heterogeneous and choice-restricted actors—this paper proposes an alternative model of PIP based on cognitive psychology. According to this framework, the options of search strategy available to each product innovator depend on certain ‘problem-solving-related’ capabilities that he or she is able or not to use. To examine the validity of this theoretical framework, this paper investigates the phenomenon of the evolution of discovery methods in the agrochemical lead discovery process. Data for this investigation have been gathered through chronological product innovation survey of an agrochemical product registration database as well as a patent and publications index database. Results from this investigation seem to confirm the above argument.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.