Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 13, Number 1, pp. 213-242
Industrial and Corporate Change 13/1 © ICC Association 2004; all rights reserved.
The evolution of inertia
Correspondence: Michael T. Hannan, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5015, USA. Email: hannan{at}stanford.edu
Abstract
This article examines some evolutionary consequences of architectural inertia in organizations. The main theorem holds that selection favors architectural inertia in the sense that the median level of inertia in a closed population of organizations increases over time. The other key theorems hold that the selection intensity favoring architectural inertia increases with the levels of intricacy and structural opacity and decreases with cultural asperity.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. A. C. Reydon and M. Scholz Why Organizational Ecology Is Not a Darwinian Research Program Philosophy of the Social Sciences, September 1, 2009; 39(3): 408 - 439. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Archibald The Impact of Density Dependence, Sociopolitical Legitimation and Competitive Intensity on Self-Help/Mutual-Aid Formation Organization Studies, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 79 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gluckler Economic geography and the evolution of networks J. Econ. Geogr., September 1, 2007; 7(5): 619 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bryson, R. Gomez, T. Kretschmer, and P. Willman The diffusion of workplace voice and high-commitment human resource management practices in Britain, 1984-1998 Ind. Corp. Change, June 1, 2007; 16(3): 395 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



