Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sako, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow L23 - Organization of Production
Right arrow L62 - Automobiles; Other Transportation Equipment
Right arrow M11 - Production Management
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 13, Number 2, pp. 281-308
Industrial and Corporate Change 13/2 © ICC Association 2004; all rights reserved.

Supplier development at Honda, Nissan and Toyota: comparative case studies of organizational capability enhancement

Mari Sako

Correspondence: Mari Sako, Professor of Management Studies, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Park End Street, Oxford OX1 1HP, UK. Email: mari.sako{at}sbs.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

What factors facilitate and constrain the sustained development and replication of organizational capabilities of suppliers? This question is addressed in a comparison of historical case studies of Toyota, Nissan and Honda in Japan. First, as expected, replication difficulty is overcome by enabling companies to share the practice, rather than the representation, of tacit knowledge. Second, interdependence in the hierarchy of routines that constitute organizational capabilities has led companies to broaden the scope of supplier development over time. Third, this broadening challenges suppliers to accept customer companies' intervention in internal investment decisions, requiring a certain mode of corporate governance. It is argued that the boundary of a capability-based firm may go beyond legally distinct units of financial control when firms are subjected to a cumulative process of capability enhancement.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ind Corp ChangeHome page
C. Y. Baldwin
Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms
Ind. Corp. Change, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 155 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ind Corp ChangeHome page
J.-A. Lamberg and H. Tikkanen
Changing sources of competitive advantage: cognition and path dependence in the Finnish retail industry 1945-1995
Ind. Corp. Change, October 1, 2006; 15(5): 811 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.