ICC Advance Access originally published online on August 26, 2005
Industrial and Corporate Change 2005 14(5):793-815; doi:10.1093/icc/dth070
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Organizational routines as a unit of analysis
Correspondence: Brian T. Pentland, Michigan State University.
Correspondence: Martha S. Feldman, University of California, Irvine.
Organizational routines can be conceptualized as generative systems with internal structures and dynamics. In this paper, we propose three different ways that organizational routines can be approached as a unit of analysis. One option is to treat the entire routine as an undifferentiated ‘black box’. A second option is to study particular parts of the routine in isolation (e.g. routines as patterns of action). A third option is to study the relationships between these parts and the processes by which the parts change. For some questions, routines can be taken as a unit of analysis without considering their internal structure, but there are many research questions for which it is useful to consider the parts of routines either separately or as they interact. We discuss the importance of understanding the internal structure and dynamics of organizational routines for exploring core organizational phenomena such as stability, change, flexibility, learning and transfer.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. C. Bruns Leveraging functionality in safety routines: Examining the divergence of rules and performance Human Relations, September 1, 2009; 62(9): 1399 - 1426. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Hales and J. Tidd The practice of routines and representations in design and development Ind. Corp. Change, August 1, 2009; 18(4): 551 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Geiger Revisiting the Concept of Practice: Toward an Argumentative Understanding of Practicing Management Learning, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 129 - 144. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Conley and E. K. Enomoto Organizational Routines in Flux: A Case Study of Change in Recording and Monitoring Student Attendance Education and Urban Society, March 1, 2009; 41(3): 364 - 386. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Runde, M. Jones, K. Munir, and L. Nikolychuk On technological objects and the adoption of technological product innovations: rules, routines and the transition from analogue photography to digital imaging Camb. J. Econ., January 1, 2009; 33(1): 1 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Essen Variability as a source of stability: Studying routines in the elderly home care setting Human Relations, November 1, 2008; 61(11): 1617 - 1644. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. W.K. Tsang and S. A. Zahra Organizational unlearning Human Relations, October 1, 2008; 61(10): 1435 - 1462. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Branzei and C. Fredette Effects of Newcomer Practicing on Cross-level Learning Distortions Management Learning, September 1, 2008; 39(4): 393 - 412. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. W. K. Tsang Transferring Knowledge to Acquisition Joint Ventures: An Organizational Unlearning Perspective Management Learning, February 1, 2008; 39(1): 5 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Antonacopoulou and R. Chiva The Social Complexity of Organizational Learning: The Dynamics of Learning and Organizing Management Learning, July 1, 2007; 38(3): 277 - 295. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. D. Cohen Reading Dewey: Reflections on the Study of Routine Organization Studies, May 1, 2007; 28(5): 773 - 786. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|