Skip Navigation


ICC Advance Access originally published online on August 1, 2006
Industrial and Corporate Change 2006 15(4):595-623; doi:10.1093/icc/dtl013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/4/595    most recent
dtl013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghemawat, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ghadar, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow F02 - International Economic Order
Right arrow F23 - Multinational Firms; International Business
Right arrow F41 - Open Economy Macroeconomics
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved.

Global integration != global concentration

Pankaj Ghemawat

Fariborz Ghadar

Correspondence: Pankaj Ghemawat, Harvard Business School, Soldiers Field Road, Boston MA 02163, USA. e-mail: pghemawat{at}hbs.edu, and IESE Business School, Avenida Pearson 21, Barcelona 08034, Spain. email: pghemawat{at}iese.edu.

Correspondence: Fariborz Ghadar, Penn State University, 429 Beam Business Administration Building, Center for Global Business Studies, University Park, PA 16802, USA. e-mail: fghadar{at}psu.edu.

There is a widespread belief that increases in the cross-border integration of markets are associated with increases in global concentration along various dimensions. This article reviews the available evidence and presents new data, indicating that increasing global integration has not been accompanied by general increases in four types of global concentration measures: industry seller concentration, cross-industry superconcentration, national/regional hegemony, and geographic concentration. The article also uses the automobile industry to illustrate a bias toward believing concentration is increasing even when it is not and to discuss possible reasons.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.