Skip Navigation


ICC Advance Access originally published online on July 31, 2006
Industrial and Corporate Change 2006 15(4):653-682; doi:10.1093/icc/dtl014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/4/653    most recent
dtl014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reichstein, T.
Right arrow Articles by Salter, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow L60 - General
Right arrow O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved.

Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms

Toke Reichstein and Ammon Salter

Correspondence: Toke Reichstein and Ammon Salter, Tanaka Business School, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK. e-mail: t.reichstein{at}imperial.ac.uk; a.salter{at}imperial.ac.uk

Although it retains a central position in the main theories of innovation, there are few studies that examine the factors that provide inducements for process innovation at the firm level. Using a large scale survey of UK manufacturing firms, we explore different explanations for why firms develop process innovations. Contrasting the sources of incremental and radical process innovation, our study indicates that there may be complementarities between them. We also find that firm size, the presence of formal research and development, and the use of suppliers as a source of knowledge all increase the chances that a firm will be a process innovator. This article discusses the implications of these results for future theoretical and empirical studies of the innovation process.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ind Corp ChangeHome page
F. Castellacci
Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth
Ind. Corp. Change, December 1, 2007; 16(6): 1105 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.