Skip Navigation


ICC Advance Access originally published online on June 11, 2007
Industrial and Corporate Change 2007 16(3):371-394; doi:10.1093/icc/dtm014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/3/371    most recent
dtm014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nonaka, I.
Right arrow Articles by Toyama, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow L21 - Business Objectives of the Firm
Right arrow M10 - General
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved.

Strategic management as distributed practical wisdom (phronesis)

Ikujiro Nonaka and Ryoko Toyama

Correspondence: Ikujiro Nonaka, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan, Xerox Distinguished Faculty Fellow, IMIO, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

Correspondence: Ryoko Toyama, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate School of Knowledge Science, Nomi, Japan. e-mail: rtoyama{at}jaist.ac.jp

This article claims that effective strategic management requires distributed wisdom (which the philosopher Aristotle called "phronesis"). Strategy is created out of one's existential belief or commitment to a vision of the future, the ability to interpret one's environment and resources subjectively, and the interaction between subjectivity and objectivity. These abilities need to be distributed among organizational members. Strategy as distributed phronesis thus emerges from practice to pursue "common goodness" in each particular situation since a firm is an entity that pursues a universal ideal and a particular reality at the same time. Such idealistic pragmatism means that in a specific and dynamic context knowledge can be created and refined to become wisdom.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
J. Rowley and F. Slack
Conceptions of wisdom
Journal of Information Science, February 1, 2009; 35(1): 110 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.