Skip Navigation


ICC Advance Access originally published online on June 24, 2007
Industrial and Corporate Change 2007 16(4):641-655; doi:10.1093/icc/dtm020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/4/641    most recent
dtm020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Link, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Bozeman, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved.

An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer*

Albert N. Link, Donald S. Siegel and Barry Bozeman

Correspondence: Albert N. Link, Department of Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA. e-mail: al_link{at}uncg.edu

Correspondence: Donald S. Siegel, Department of Management and Marketing, A. Gary Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California at Riverside, Anderson Hall, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. e-mail: donald.siegel{at}ucr.edu

Correspondence: Barry Bozeman, Department of Public Administration and Policy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. e-mail: bbozeman{at}uga.edu

Formal university technology transfer mechanisms, through licensing agreements, research joint ventures, and university-based startups, have attracted considerable attention in the academic literature. Surprisingly, there has been little systematic empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal technology transfer. This paper presents empirical evidence on the determinants of three types of informal technology transfer by faculty members: transfer of commercial technology, joint publications with industry scientists, and industrial consulting. We find that male, tenured and research-grant active faculty members are more likely to engage in all three forms of informal technology transfer.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ind Corp ChangeHome page
D. S. Siegel, M. Wright, and A. Lockett
The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: organizational and societal implications
Ind. Corp. Change, August 1, 2007; 16(4): 489 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.