© 1994 Oxford University Press
research-article |
The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction
Institute of Management, Innovation and Organization 554 Barrows Hall, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720
*Graduate School of Business, Harvard University Morgan Hall, Room T97, Soldiers Field, Boston, MA 02163, USA
Abstract
An expanded paradigm is needed to explain how competitive advantage is gained and held. Firms resorting to ‘resource-based strategy’ attempt to accumulate valuable technology assets and employ an aggressive intellectual property stance. However, winners in the global marketplace have been firms demonstrating timely responsiveness and rapid and flexible product innovation, along with the management capability to effectively coordinate and redeploy internal and external competences. This source of competitive advantage, ‘dynamic capabilities’, emphasizes two aspects. First, it refers to the shifting character of the environment; second, it emphasizes the key role of strategic management in appropriately adapting, integrating, and re-configuring internal and external organizational skills, resources, and functional competences toward changing environment.5 Only recently have researchers begun to focus on the specifics of developing firm-specific capabilities and the manner in which competences are renewed to respond to shifts in the business environment. The dynamic capabilities approach provides a coherent framework to integrate existing conceptual and empirical knowledge, and facilitate prescription. This paper argues that the competitive advan is tage of firms stems from dynamic capabilities rooted in high performance routines operating inside the firm, embedded in the firm's processes, and conditioned by its history. It offers dynamic capabilities as an emerging paradigm of the modern business firm that draws on multiple disciplines and advances, with the help of industry studies in the USA and elsewhere.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F. Malerba, R. Nelson, L. Orsenigo, and S. Winter Vertical integration and disintegration of computer firms: a history-friendly model of the coevolution of the computer and semiconductor industries Ind. Corp. Change, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 197 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Pieroni and F. Pompei Evaluating innovation and labour market relationships: the case of Italy Camb. J. Econ., March 1, 2008; 32(2): 325 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knowledge and venture funding: complementarities and financial contracts Ind. Corp. Change, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 851 - 873.
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Peirone Knowledge and venture funding: Complementarities and financial contracts Ind. Corp. Change, September 19, 2007; (2007) dtm029v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Augier and D. J. Teece Understanding complex organization: the role of know-how, internal structure, and human behavior in the evolution of capabilities Ind. Corp. Change, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 395 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. P. Knudsen Patterns of technological competence accumulation: a proposition for empirical measurement Ind. Corp. Change, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 1075 - 1108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Hobday, A. Davies, and A. Prencipe Systems integration: a core capability of the modern corporation Ind. Corp. Change, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 1109 - 1143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|