Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROSENBLOOM, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by CHRISTENSEN, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 Oxford University Press

research-article

Technological Discontinuties, Organizational Capabilities, and Strategic Commitments

RICHARD S. ROSENBLOOM and CLAYTON M. CHRISTENSEN

(Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University Soldiers Field, Boston, MA 02163, USA)

Abstract

Innovations based on radically new technologies are believed to create advantages for entrants over incumbents in the relevant markets. Under what circumstances is this true? To what extent do incumbents' disadvantages stem from their failure to make timely commitments to new capabilities and new strategies as opposed to their inability to implement those commitments effectively? We explore those questions in relation to recent literature in economics and organization theory and introduce the concept of the ‘value network’. Historical evidence suggests that entrants find greatest advantage when innovations disrupt established trajectories of technological progress, a circumstance associated with moves to new value networks. The incumbent's disadvantage, hence, seems to be associated with an inability to change strategies, not technologies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ind Corp ChangeHome page
F. Malerba, R. Nelson, L. Orsenigo, and S. Winter
Vertical integration and disintegration of computer firms: a history-friendly model of the coevolution of the computer and semiconductor industries
Ind. Corp. Change, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 197 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ind Corp ChangeHome page
F. Fatas-Villafranca, J. Sanchez-Choliz, and G. Jarne
Modeling the co-evolution of national industries and institutions
Ind. Corp. Change, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 65 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ind Corp ChangeHome page
M. P. Knudsen
Patterns of technological competence accumulation: a proposition for empirical measurement
Ind. Corp. Change, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 1075 - 1108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Economic and Industrial DemocracyHome page
W. Lazonick
The Theory of the Market Economy and the Social Foundations of Innovative Enterprise
Economic and Industrial Democracy, February 1, 2003; 24(1): 9 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
R. Durand
Firm Selection: An Integrative Perspective
Organization Studies, May 1, 2001; 22(3): 393 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
G. Dowell and A. Swaminathan
Racing and Back-Pedalling into the Future: New Product Introduction and Organizational Mortality in the US Bicycle Industry, 1880-1918
Organization Studies, March 1, 2000; 21(2): 405 - 431.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.