Skip Navigation



ICC Advance Access published online on May 16, 2006
Industrial and Corporate Change, doi:10.1093/icc/dtl011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/3/549    most recent
dtl011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chabane, N.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved

Article

The changing face and strategies of big business in South Africa: more than a decade of political democracy

Neo Chabane 1 *, Andrea Goldstein 2, and Simon Roberts 1

1 Corporate Strategy and Industrial Development research project, School of Economic and Business Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
2 OECD Development Centre, 49 avenue des Ternes, 75017 Paris, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Neo Chabane, E-mail: neoc{at}numsa.org.za


  Abstract

Under the apartheid regime, South African business was marked by a high degree of concentration, both in terms of ownership and activities; indeed, it could be argued that this concentration was both created by and reinforced the exclusions linked to apartheid. In this paper, we identify the main changes that have characterized South Africa’s big business since democracy in 1994--unbundling of traditional conglomerates, transfer of primary listing to overseas stock exchanges, and slow emergence of black-owned economic groups. These changes are related to key policy actions taken by government, including liberalization, black economic empowerment (BEE) policies, and competition policies. We demonstrate that South Africa still maintains its own distinctive features, including the very large, although reduced, weight of a few conglomerates, while evolving toward structures more similar to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) norms. Finally, we argue that the policy emphasis on ownership transfers, combined with limits in the enforcement of competition policies, has restricted the capacity to generate additional jobs and meet the ultimate objectives of BEE.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.