ICC Advance Access published online on August 1, 2006
Industrial and Corporate Change, doi:10.1093/icc/dtl013
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Harvard Business School, Soldiers Field Road, Boston MA 02163, USA; IESE Business School, Avenida Pearson 21,
Barcelona 08034, Spain
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. There is a widespread belief that increases in the cross-border integration of markets are associated with increases in global concentration along various dimensions. This article reviews the available evidence and presents new data, indicating that increasing global integration has not been accompanied by general increases in four types of global concentration measures: industry seller concentration, cross-industry superconcentration, national/regional hegemony, and geographic concentration. The article also uses the automobile industry to illustrate a bias toward believing concentration is increasing even when it is not and to discuss possible reasons.
Article
Global integration
Pankaj Ghemawat 1 * and Fariborz Ghadar 2
global concentration
2 Penn State University, 429 Beam Business Administration Building, Center for Global Business Studies, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Pankaj Ghemawat, E-mail: pghemawat{at}hbs.edu/pghemawat@iese.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?